Chuang's Kangaroo court hides CIA's role in Uranium One

Chuang's Kangaroo court hides CIA's role in Uranium One

David Ira Salem, CIA/SEC/DOJ attorney, prosecutor in ongoing Mark T. Lambert Uranium One case

https://ccjs.umd.edu/facultyprofile/salem/david

David Ira Salem works as an attorney for the CIA.

Office of General Counsel.

Someone has to represent the CIA in a criminal trial.

It is Salem.

His picture and resume is posted at the top of this story.

He represents the best interests of the CIA.

Over the best interests of the:

  • American people

  • FBI

  • Justice Department

CIA Office of General Counsel David Ira Salem.png

https://www.cia.gov/offices-of-cia/general-counsel/

Salem is also the prosecutor in the Uranium One case.

It reopened this morning at 9 a.m.

In Federal District Court of Greenbelt, Maryland.

A suburb of Washington, D.C.

It is a conflict of interest.

Salem filed motions to suppress evidence.

Judge Theodore Chuang approved Salem’s motions to suppress:

  • two million documents

  • the expert witness for the defense from testifying

  • testimony and references to FBI informant William Douglas Campell

  • evidence favorable to the defendant

  • the CIA’s role in Uranium One before 2011 going back to 1993

  • limiting the defense to one witness, Carol Condrey, an adverse witness

Lambert+order+suppressing+evidenced+May+24th Brady evidence.png
chuang best photo updated.jpg

Judge Theodore Chuang (above)

https://brassballs.blog/home/uranium-one-trial-starts-october-24-24th-theodore-chuang-maryland-greenbelt-mark-t-tutt-lambert-tenex-hillary-clinton-foundation-mikerin-condrey-fisk-rod-daren-tonya-chutkan-rosenstein-kavanaugh-brett-bill-rod-campbell-william-d-day

As prosecutor, Salem helped filed 20 pages of items it would like to exclude as evidence.

It starts at Page 20 in this link:

https://www.scribd.com/document/429365609/Mark-T-Lambert-trial-prosecution-s-motions-to-exclude-evidence-etal-39-pages-dated-Oct-7th-2019

Salem was also successful in excluding evidence presented in other Uranium One cases.

It included the fact that the FBI never:

  • investigated

  • arrested

  • signed a sworn statement as to the defendants’ alleged crimes

  • was asked to seize evidence from a search warrant

  • had custody of the evidence

  • had a grand jury indictment

Sources:

The defense can win this case by asking the prosecutors for the “chain of custody” of the evidence.

Or who has it?

Where?

Any break in the chain wins the case for the defense.

However, the defense is in the tank too.

It never asked for any of these things regarding the evidence other than:

  • where is it?

  • how come no one can read it?

  • what does the Department of Energy (DOE) have it?

Here are the four Uranium One cases:

Uranium One DOJ four joint cases.png

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fraud/fcpa/cases/mark-lambert

Instead, the Department of Energy (DOE), said they have “Special Agents” who have the same authority as the FBI.

Under what legal authority?

The CIA?

No one is challenging the DOE’s position that their Special Agents are equal to or better than the ones working for the FBI.

Including the FBI.

Prosecutors have used false identities for two of their informants in the Uranium One cases.

One of them is Rodney Fisk.

He supposedly died in 2011.

Any witnesses to his funeral?

His wife lives in London and worked for American University.

Fisk died having no assets, according to his will.

The court waived fees in Fisk’s probating of his will because there were no assets.

Fisk’s true identity is Alex Copson.

The pseudo FBI agent working for the DOE is in a similar capacity is David Gadren,

His identify remains protected because it is false.

And faked in the court record.

Gadren is read into the court record.

He says nothing.

Nothing.

Ask the court reporters.

Gadren never attended any court proceeding.

The Judge asked Prosecutor Salem if he planned on having Gadren testify for the prosecution.

“No”, said Salem.

It is like the cop was fails to appear for your court hearing on a traffic ticket.

If your arresting officer fails to appear on your court date, the case is supposed to be thrown out.

No one is testifying against you.

This is the Federal District Court of Maryland.

https://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/

This is Uranium One.

https://www.scribd.com/document/411920875/Department-of-Energy-Special-Agent-David-Gadren-s-10-page-affidavit-of-money-laundering-scheme-in-Uranium-One

Defense lawyers could have called Gadren to the stand.

Imagine.

The court issues a subpoena to Gadren to testify.

He fails to show up.

No one can find him.

It would have confirmed Gadren never existed.

Then who falsified the arresting sworn statements of criminal offenses?

The arrests of all the Uranium One defendants were made through the:

  • Office of Inspector General for the Departments of Energy (DOE)

  • U.S. Attorney Rod J. Rosenstein

  • Andrew G. McCabe of the FBI

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/russian-nuclear-energy-official-pleads-guilty-money-laundering-conspiracy-involving

https://www.energy.gov/ig/about-us/careers/criminal-investigator

Besides Salem, who else is collecting two checks?

One from the CIA.

One from the FBI or Justice Department.

Peter Strzok (strock).

Strzok+slim.jpg

Former CIA/FBI Agent Peter Strzok (above)

Source:

https://brassballs.blog/home/strzok-worked-for-cia-and-fbi-at-the-same-time-in-counterespionage

And Lisa Barsoomian.

Rod Rosenstein is her husband.

She gets two checks too.

One from the CIA.

One from the Justice Department.

Just like Salem.

Barsoomian Lisa photo.png
Chuang face sheet top Oct 28th 2019 transcript.png
Gadren David Special Agent DOE Condrey case July 15th 2015.png
Lambert Fisk page 9 admit CIA asset.png

The Mike Flynn criminal cases had 22,000 documents.

Lambert two million documents page eight dated May 20th.png
Lambert two million docs mentioned first time May 30th, 2018.png
Lambert transcript Sept 13th 2018 2 point 7 million documents page five.png
Lambert transcript Sept 13th 2018 page eleven records with DOE.png

Updated Nov. 8th

Fisk Rod photo twitter.png
Butina's boyfriend to testify against Trump?

Butina's boyfriend to testify against Trump?

No specifics in Flynn Intel appeal

No specifics in Flynn Intel appeal